Backend developers
Python, Node.js, NestJS and FastAPI. APIs, integrations, data models and the parts users never see.
Team Extension
Development team extension is how you add engineers to a team that already works, without a three-month hiring cycle. Tell us which roles are missing. Interview the people we propose. Within 3–7 days they're in your standups and your Slack, taking tickets your tech lead assigns. Contracts, payroll, equipment and replacements stay on our side. Rates start at $20 an hour, with two weeks' notice either way.
Most companies call us halfway through a roadmap. The release date is fixed, someone senior just left, and the CVs from recruiters don't match the stack. Software team extension closes that gap with people who already know how product teams operate: about 70% of our engineers have five or more years in corporate environments, so nobody has to explain code review to them.
The team extension model is narrow on purpose. We don't take over your product or write your plan. Our engineers become members of your team and work off your board under your review rules. Day-to-day direction comes from your lead; the employment side (contracts, payroll, laptops, sick leave) stays with us.
Vendors use the labels loosely, so here is how the three common setups actually differ.
| Team extension | Dedicated team | Project outsourcing | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who runs daily work | Your tech lead | Our PM, on your roadmap | Our PM, on agreed scope |
| Who owns delivery | You | Shared | Vendor |
| Typical setup | Single roles added to your team | A full cross-functional team | Whatever the scope needs |
| Fits when | You have a lead and a process, not enough hands | You need a whole team but keep your roadmap | You want a finished product handed over |
| Pricing | Hourly, per engineer | Hourly, per engineer | Estimate per stage |
If nobody on your side can own the architecture and review code, extension is usually the wrong choice. An extended engineer won't make those calls for you, and they shouldn't. A dedicated team with our project manager is the safer setup there, or a managed outsourcing project if you want the whole build handed over. We tell clients this on the first call, before any CVs go out.
Our team extension services cover the roles below. Every engineer comes with a CV and a call with you before anything is signed, and a manager on our side handles the admin at no extra cost.
Python, Node.js, NestJS and FastAPI. APIs, integrations, data models and the parts users never see.
React and Next.js for dashboards, customer portals and SaaS interfaces.
React Native, so one engineer ships to iOS and Android from a single codebase.
For small teams where one person carries a feature from database to button.
Pipelines, ETL and large-scale scraping with Scrapy. Data collection is one of the areas udata knows best.
Manual testing plus basic automated tests. They test each feature as soon as it's done, alongside development.
Interfaces and flows, working next to your developers inside the same sprint.
Four situations come up on almost every intro call. If you recognize yours, IT team extension is likely a faster fix than hiring:
A caveat. Extended engineers are only as fast as the onboarding they get. If the repo has no README and the real documentation lives in one person's head, plan the first week for setup. We see the same thing on our own projects: unclear starts get paid for later, usually in rework.
Our rates are public. These are hourly rates for long-term engagements; for shorter stints the rate is $25–40 an hour depending on the role.
| Role | Hourly rate |
|---|---|
| Backend developer | $20 |
| Frontend developer | $20 |
| Mobile developer (React Native) | $22 |
| Full-stack developer | $24 |
| Data engineer | $25 |
| QA engineer | $20 |
| UI/UX designer | $15–25 |
| Manager on our side | Included |
In monthly terms, a backend and a frontend developer working full time come to about $6,700 at 168 hours. One full-stack engineer is roughly $4,000. Use these for budgeting. Seniority and engagement length move the final quote, so wait for that before you plan around a number.
No lock-in
Either side can end the engagement with two weeks' notice. If an engineer isn't working out, we put a replacement in place within 5–10 working days.
Here is the path from the first call to a merged pull request.
Inside your team, our engineers follow your rules. Two-week sprints in Jira? They run two-week sprints in Jira. Each of them posts a short written status in your Slack every day, so you never chase anyone for an update. Teams without a process yet can work in our own tracker, where budget and scope sit next to the tickets and you see spend without asking for a report.
For US clients we commit to at least four hours of overlap, usually 9am to 1pm Eastern. Western Europe sits one or two hours from Kyiv, so the working day lines up almost completely.
People mix these up constantly, partly because vendors sell the same offer under both names. The difference is who owns the outcome. Outstaffing services, which is what team extension is, mean the engineers are employed by us and work under your direction. You own delivery. With outsourcing you hand over a scope, and the vendor carries the plan along with the risk that its estimates turn out wrong.
Outsourcing IT team extension to a vendor still leaves every product decision with you. Companies with a strong tech lead like that, because they get capacity and keep control. If the internal process is weak, though, extra engineers mostly produce more pull requests for an overloaded lead to review. If you're weighing the two models in detail, our guide to staff augmentation vs. a dedicated team goes through the trade-offs.
Every top IT staff augmentation company promises senior talent and a fast start, and you can't check either from a website. Ask for things you can verify:
A US logistics SaaS company had its own CTO, an in-house team of six and a carrier-integration roadmap slipping by a quarter. They asked for two Python backend engineers with FastAPI experience. The CTO interviewed four of our candidates, picked two, and both were in his standup on day five. A QA engineer joined two weeks later and tested each integration as it landed, so releases stopped ending in a weekend crunch. The board, the priorities and the code reviews stayed with the client. At long-term rates the three-person extension runs about $10,000 a month. Ten months in, the engagement is still going: the integration backlog that triggered the first call was cleared by month five, and releases moved from every four weeks to every two.
If your stack is on this list, software team extension with us moves quickly. If it isn't, say so on the call and we'll tell you straight whether we have someone.
At our long-term rates, one backend developer full time is about $3,400 a month and a full-stack engineer about $4,000. Two developers usually land between $6,700 and $8,400, depending on roles. Short engagements cost more per hour, $25–40.
Within 3–7 days of you approving a candidate.
Tell us early. We replace them within 5–10 working days, and the new person picks up from the same tickets. If the whole arrangement isn't working, two weeks' notice ends it.
You do. IP transfers to you under the contract, and the code lives in your repositories from the first commit, so there's nothing to hand over when an engagement ends.
Not quite. With team extension your lead manages our engineers directly. A dedicated team comes with our project manager and works through your roadmap as a unit. If you don't have a tech lead, the dedicated setup is usually the better fit.
Short on engineers this quarter?
Name the roles and the stack. You interview every candidate before anything is signed.
Book a call →